Evidently a glutton for punishment, and he doesn't know his betters never mind who he's up against. I gave him all the clues with my first response, but he obviously doesn't have the depth of intellect to avoid me.
His response to my previous post:
@Guinness, "Everybody knows white kids are orientated into racism from an early age by their parents and have to unlearn racism. It doesn’t happen automatically." You were probably raised by a Black woman but today you think you can stand on two feet and ask me what I know about white people? Let me tell you; they all think like you, that they're Messiahnic and are put on this earth to save helpless Blacks. News for you; I have never worked for a white person my whole life. I know a lot of Blacks who have never done so and who are doing far better that any Black person your white employers ever gave work. I probably know more about you than you do about me; that's why your whole comment is based on assumptions which don't belong to you; you were never born with but were inculcated to you over a dinner table. I was never subjected to such racist gibberish tutoring as a child that's why I don't seek your love or approval to speak my mind. And by the way what do you know about Africans (since your point of departure clearly indicates you don't see yourself as one but some settler)?
G-Man's retort:
Gakwi. I was respectful enough to not only NOT point out that you NEVER start off an opinion backed up with 'everybody knows' (in lieu of facts and statistics), but also gave you the benefit of the doubt by suggesting that you were generalising and not speaking in absolutes when I used the word 'generally' to describe your point. You are obviously not respectful or intelligent enough to recognise this.
But be that as it may, I must hold you to the standards you generally hold white people to: one of excellence. No more allowances for your obvious intellectual shortcomings, and no more letting you away with utter nonsense.
I did not base my comments on assumptions (think about it, but what did that actually mean?). I came to generally accepted conclusions based on the statistics on hand. My two conclusions were: Blacks are the bigger racists in South Africa, and that white racism is largely a dearly held myth, played by those who are attempting to cover their limitations, be they cultural or personal. This was simply concluded by pointing you to the inter-racial murder rates in SA.
My second conclusion (or assumption, as you refer to it as) was that whites are contributing far more to SA both socially and economically than their population figures would suggest. The reasons are immaterial, but the fact of the matter is SA's tax base is largely white. Your countries biggest employers are all white. These are ACTUAL generally held views that can be taken as fact. The IRS will back this up. There are only so many jobs for taxi-drivers and alleged writers and stick wavers.
Gakwi, I had asked you to simply look at white people on balance, as this was NOT an attempt to point out racial superiority. But this appears to be quite beyond your capabilities for reasons best known to yourself, but I suspect that your innate hatred for whites has blinded you to our virtues completely, and that you are only capable of seeing the alleged bad in us, which is wholly manufactured I might add. I neither asked nor expect any approval from you. On the contrary in fact.
In conclusion, I would add that you are a major part of what the problems in SA are. You are a paradigm of your nation's modern failures. REAL progressive countries wishing to better themselves fill their universities with engineers and economists. Scientists and financiers. You have chosen to go down the well worn path of destruction by becoming a political analyst. A rather useless and unproductive degree. And you are using what little use this degree might have, by bashing your fellow citizens over the head with.
