Blacks supporting Apartheid's evils

This is sure to raise some hackles.

http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/koketsomoeti/2013/05/03/when-educational-programmes-do-more-harm-than-good/

G-man:


Do NuSAns suffer from Selective Amnesia? Has the memories and lessons of the sheer destruction that was Apartheid been forgotten? I'm amazed. No. Scrap that. I'm appalled.

It wasn't the petty Apartheid laws that hurt black SAns in the long term. Sitting on the same park benches, or standing alongside one another at the trough would have been nice, I suppose, but it was the Group Areas Act that caused the most harm. The black family in SA had been strong and united up until this Act reared it's ugly head. The break up of the black family was nothing more than catastrophic, and is a social disease that SA lives with today.

The prisons are filled to the brim with young black males who are the products of single mothers. The hooligans and street thugs running amok in SA are fatherless and directionless. The tik addled lay-abouts lying in the streets have the single parent household to thank for their situation. Those heartless scum who will invade a home or hijack a car and torment their victims are ALL the products of a single mother environment.

We cannot and should not hold the single mother in high esteem. The two-parent household should be encouraged, and the single mother scorned and vilified. SA society just cannot afford more delinquents who grow up to be violent, self destructive moochers who are the spawn of the single mother. Encouraging them does nothing except destroy, no matter how old-fashioned you lot seem to think it is.

One for the NuSAns vultures to feast over

Doubt this will pass GO, never mind collect 200 Rondt.

http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/lesleyperkes/2013/04/23/keep-your-elections-to-yourself/

G-man:


Mrs. Suzman never called for 'The armed struggle to continue'. Neither did she order "Shoot! Shoot to kill!" at Shell House. She also didn't go arm-in-arm into the fourth Constitutional Workshop with Cyril Ramaphosa asking for one 'simple' amendment; the authority to alter the Constitution with a 2/3rds majority.

Suzman never desperately called for calm after Hani's death after stoking the fires of division and hate for a few years. She also didn't ignore the black-on-white murder tally, and nor did she completely deny the existence of a sinister farm murder rate.

To place the name of Mandela with that of Suzman in the same sentence, is disrespectful of Mrs. Suzman, her family, and her legacy as a compassionate and decent person who did her best for ALL South Africans.

Pistorius and Dewani

William takes a peek at the nauseating NuSAns reaction to both on social media.

http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/williamsaundersonmeyer/2013/04/20/pistorius-case-highlights-the-failings-of-social-media/

G-man:


Inasmuch as social media fuels sentiments, it also gauges the mood and opinion of SA society in general on any given subject or catastrophe. In South Africa this was particularly evident when Dewani's bride was murdered at the hands of some common-or-garden variety African street thugs. What was eyebrow raising to we who don't live in SA anymore - mercifully - was the reaction from the SA public, politicians and authorities.

Not only did they condemn a poor man who had just lost his bride, but they were so eager to protect their home-grown scum over an international tourist (I'm sure desperation was a motivator) that they took the word of an admitted killer over that of a man who had no record of criminal behaviour whatsoever. Even the authorities were overly keen to take the words of the Congolese murderer over an innocent man, such was the desire to protect your tourist industry.

South Africans cannot be trusted to behave normally, or respond to tragedy compassionately without taking the knee-jerk route and defending what we normal people see as the indefensible. As with just about everything else in SA, they seem to add an edge to crime, politics and now even social media amongst everything else. You are an aggressive nation and it rears it's ugly head in traffic jams and social media. These are the symptoms of a violently diseased nation.

Time for South Africans to take a very long, hard look at yourselves. To see yourselves as others see you.

Another hate-filled NuSAns spins a yarn

Even her name suggests how much she hates white folk, and is very motivated to deflect blame from her beloved ANC onto the laps of innocent whites.

http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/malaikawaazania/2013/03/20/the-problem-in-sa-is-not-the-anc/

G-man:


What a load of absolute tripe. Gobbledy-gook, dressed up as high brow independent thinking. This is of course nothing of the sort.

Your case is not well made when you consider hard, cold facts and statistics, so allow me to enlighten you with two relevant ones.

- Whites make up around 8% of the population and are contributing to the tax coffers at a far higher rate in raw Rondts, still. The ANC - in charge of the redistribution of said taxes - have failed miserably in not only elevating the black recipients, but in not suppressing whites. They've had twenty years to fleece whites, but haven't learnt that TRUE wealth is not redistributed, but only created. And it is created be investing in education, civil works and industry. The ANC is not encouraging this in black SA but has convinced the pipple that wealth is an endless stream of white money to be re-distributed.

- Whites make up by far, the largest number of new business owners in SA. Not pro rata, but in sheer numbers. The ANC due to it's concentration on land reform, Affirmative Action, BEE and other counter-productive programs have convinced the voters that salvation ONLY lies in removing white private property, and handing it over to blacks, no matter the reasoning. The blether over skills transfer is nothing but hot air and merely shifts the responsibility to whites who seem all too eager - unfortunately - to buy into this nonsense and aid in this useless effort in political patronising.

"With our metjies....

....we will make the country ungovernable". So said one Winnie Winsome Mandela.

Considering the mouthpiece who made the charge in the following Sowetan article, we all know that the word 'bourgeoisie' is code word for 'white'.

http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2013/03/13/we-will-burn-the-gautrain-protesters

Why is it that they insist on being so destructive whenever they don't get their way? In what way does this facilitate the required improvements in service? What sort of person makes these sorts of threats?

And another point: Who do they think uses the Gautrain if it isn't the Boss and Entrepreneurial class? If the job creators, whip-crackers and general management and labour-policemen and women can't get to their places of work, then who will open the doors for this layabout arsonist-class of welts?

And take note folk, THESE are the leaders in The New (yet hopelessly unimproved) South Africa. He is an admitted politician who allegedly uses political speech. These people who would willingly place civilian lives in danger, destroy public property and break the law wantonly, are the people's heroes. What does that say about the MAJORITY of South Africans today, and the legacy of the Mandelas? Nowhere else in the world would any destructive minded person get a way with these sorts of threats, particularly the racist undertones (although hardly subtle in my mind). 'English speaking' indeed. South Africa has an all too recent history of a random assortment of casual bystanders taking words like these to heart, and becoming a destructive, mindless force to be reckoned with. The carnage these people have wrought through the past years is untold, and the record of these bystanders is all too vivid to be ignored. These are commands that the pipple hear, not suggestions or empty rhetoric, they're taken to heart and acted upon.

I have absolutely no faith in these NuSAns and those who either ignore, listen to, give a platform or otherwise encourage this sort of scum. He and his savage opinions and thoughts should be roundly condemned, but they're not. Your country has so very little hope of progressing, or not becoming just another African hellhole.

Disgusting. Really.

Mandela's legacy in a nutshell

There's a lot more I could add, but I'll wait for another day. This is in a response to a posting after an idiot tried his hand in (mis)informing us.

http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Nelson-Mandela-20130310

G-man:

Quite right. And just to correct the above, Mandela's first speech called for 'the armed struggle to continue'. Immediately after that, the country was lit and SA endures THIS legacy ever since. Only on the murder of Chris Hani did Mandela repent and call for peace. Right up until then he was saber rattling, fist waving, rabble-rousing and ginning up the crowds with the best of them. He was a man without any clear direction once the burning was done. His legacy is a twisted one and quite contrary to popular belief.

He's an editor? Really?

Shockingly bad article, yet some of the responses are noticeably encouraging.

http://www.iol.co.za/the-star/let-s-get-angry-about-the-right-things-1.1483083#.UTu6vhyzeSo

G-man:

I'm stunned that you have been Affirmatively Actionised into the position of editor, Makhudu. This was badly written, filled with mistakes and your point was not well made. So we shouldn't be angry, but we must?

Ignoring how appalling this piece was, I wish to point out that whenever whites decide to complain, 'whinge', form a protest against the government or otherwise make their negative presence felt, they are immediately branded as racists for acting against the noble rule of the black man. How on earth you're supposed to act democratically as a responsible citizen and a minority, when you're 'put in your place' by the ruling class with the eager approval of the vast majority of the country (including you, I suspect Makhudu), is beyond me.

I also would like to mention that the rest of the world is NOT sitting on the edge of it's seat, waiting for South Africans to make another move (irresponsible or other), or prove to us all why you're such wonderful people. You're really not all that important. In fact, on the contrary; we view you as being nothing more than on the road to being another failed African state. As far as we can all see, it's only a matter of time before we start seeing little kids in America jangling tins outside Macy's at Christmas telling us that it doesn't snow in South Africa.

White people in SA need to be angry at The ANC and all it's blithering idiot cadres, comrades and appointed filth. They also need to be angry at YOU and your media chums Makhudu as you have failed the democracy by not doing enough to inform, point fingers and hold the government accountable. You too (and your black media journalists) are culpable as you ignored the failings of Mandela, the complacency of Mbeki and the unadulterated lunacy of Zuma. Until now, while it is convenient. Truthfully, the rot started a long time ago, it is sheer cowardice to apportion blame, and even hint at white irresponsibility while you have dithered, fawned, ignored and patronised while the going was relatively good. Well now it isn't. How gutless.

First, embrace whites and accept them as your fellow South Africans with an equal voice in how your country is governed, with all the respect minorities should be afforded. Secondly, recognise the contribution (in particular their taxes) whites make to the country and how productive and valuable they are. Thirdly, roundly condemn the ANC excesses and the destructive actions of your fellow black protesters. And fourthly, start acting responsibly and give whites the voice they need to set the country straight.

As an editor, you should set an example. I will be keeping an eye on you from here on out.